Higher intelligence is not only a way to increase survival rates , it could also improve reproductive success , at least among manful mosquitofish ( Gambusia holbrooki ) . The determination does n’t leaven the popular hypothesis that human intelligence agency is a product of needing to impress mates , but it does show something correspondent may have go on on a vastly smaller scale .
There are obvious benefits to intelligence , help brute find food or increase the chance of ward off predators , either of which will ameliorate survival . It ’s particularly important in societal species that need to communicate and get along . Nevertheless , brainiac are also very energy - intensive , and sometimes it is surd to influence out how birth supernumerary smarts apologize its cost . That ’s particularly the case in the foresightful period between humans reach our current intelligence , and when we set forth cook up the tools that gave us declamatory survival advantages . mayhap impressing potential spouse was the spur .
One way to shed light on that is to see at whether intelligence provides a generative advantage in species that are easy to study . Their lowly size and fleet reproductive cycle mean mosquitofish form a particularly honorable written report subject , soDr Ivan Vinogradovof the Australian National University and colleague attempt to get rid of survival advantages for smart mosquitofish to see if they still had more issue .

The setup for the first test, where males had to learn to go around the transparent screen, rather than trying to go through.Image Credit: David Fanner, courtesy of Ivan Vinogradov
The well-to-do part was creating marauder - free ponds and ensuring no mosquitofish went athirst . More of a challenge was test the subject ' intelligence .
Our study paint a picture that intelligence in mosquitofish is n’t only motor by their want to find food or quash predator , but also by the complex challenges of finding dearest
Rather than assume a single universal mosquitofish intelligence , Vinogradov and colleagues put all 30 males in their bailiwick through four tests covering ego - control , spacial learning , associative learning , and reversal erudition .

The maze the males had to find their way through to score high on the test wasn’t all that complex, but these are fish.Image Credit: David Fanner, courtesy of Ivan Vinogradov
The first exam inquire whether a male would drown around a sheer barrier to get to a female person , or keep render to go through ; while the 2nd required them to detect their way through a maze . The third and fourth were join : first learn how quickly they came to associate a special color with a food for thought wages , and then how apace they accommodate when the coloring ’s substance changed .
“ A secondary finish of the survey is to look at oecumenical intelligence , ” Vinogradov , lead author of the study , told IFLScience . The squad hoped to see whether being strong in one form of intelligence was highly correlated with performance in others , or if it was common to be specialize . Once again , this echoes a long - run debate regarding humanintelligence .
It turns out correlation were very downhearted – other than between associative and reverse learning – suggest mosquitofish are not given to a logical general tidings , and the decisiveness to run several tests was the correct one .
Mosquitofish mate very frequently , and it is common for a exclusive brood to have multiple male parent . The team genetically prove all 2,430 issue in the 11 pond after 20 day and found that male who scored eminent for self - control and spatial learning had many more progeny . grading high for other forms of news , as well as torso size and strikingness , was also associate with more offspring , but not to a statistically significant extent .
Vinogradov told IFLScience that the squad could think of three possibility for that observation , given the Pisces the Fishes were not using these skill to evade predators .
Mosquitofish do n’t really get the whole consent matter , with male person often hassle female into union , or sneaking up on them . Consequently , Vinogradov told IFLScience ; “ It ’s potential these skills make males good at one attack or the other . Alternatively , female may exercise some choice that is n’t obvious to us . ” Perhaps the female person are keep on an eye on the male , and accepting the advances of males who have expose these figure of intelligence .
“ The third possibility is there is some connexion between brain and overall body conditions , so perhaps the fresh fish are faster because of good body term , ” told IFLScience . “ Intelligence could be secondary . ”
More studies could tease some of these questions out .
“ This suggests that intelligence in mosquitofish part evolved through sexual option , where trait that advance sexual union and fertilization success become more common over generations . intimate selection is usually stronger in males than female because in most specie there are more Male seeking mate than females quick to couple and cover , ” said in astatement .
Optimistically he added ; “ Our bailiwick suggests that intelligence in mosquitofish is n’t only take by their need to find food or deflect piranha , but also by the complex challenge of finding passion . This demo that , much like humans , love conquers all . ”
Vinogradov ’s 2nd explanation has been shown to go for in budgerigars , where femaleswant to get closeto males who manifest trouble - work acquisition . “ There are lots of field that investigate intelligence and procreative success , ” Vinogradov state . “ They ’re mostly focussed on birds and show more healthy bird lie in more testicle . ” Few have follow through to see how many of these egg survive , something Vinogradov said is much hard . Vinogradov ’s team skip that footstep by genetically testing the entire population of the pool .
Vinogradov did n’t require to be draw off into the debate about human intelligence , other than to say his team ’s study ; “ Does show a mechanics for sexual pick is potential . ” Mosquitofish were specifically chosen because many rarify factor that would befuddle the link in metal money nigher to us , such as parental tutelage , were not relevant .
The written report is release in the journalNature Ecology and Evolution .