Dear Macrovision: A Response to Responses to Steve Jobs’ “Thoughts on Music”

Dear Fred Amoroso ( and assorted other CEOs , etc . ) ,

Jesus CHRIST . end with the “ open letters . ” We lie with you ’re justcopying Stevebecause he ’s the nerveless small fry in class and all , but come in on . You know how everyone charge you guys of just copying Apple ? You ’re doing it . Right . Now . He does n’t care what you think . And no , he ’s not going to hand over FairPlay , so give up need .

I have in mind , Fred , dude , did you escape uslaughing at the RIAAfor guess Steve - o was offer to let the rest of the industry get their grubby little hands on FairPlay ? Apparently so , because you say :

Last Of Us 7 Ellie Crash

https://gizmodo.com/steve-jobs-on-drm-it-must-die-234448

Should you desire , we would also take up responsibility for FairPlay as a part of our evolving DRM offering and enable it to interoperate across other Defense Reutilization and Marketing Service , thus increase consumer choice and driving commonality across gimmick .

No , no no . That was n’t the point ! He was n’t offering anything . The letter was a Puerto Rico move . That was all . If you think this is fantabulous Commonwealth of Puerto Rico for yourself , you ’re wrong . It just makes you look like a jackass for not knowing how to take . Besides , if you were going to read one diminutive section out of circumstance , why could n’t you have done so on the part where he suppose Apple would drop DRM if it could ?

Mission Impossible 8 Underwater

talk of DRM , it is not “ an enabler , ” as you arrogate . The primal parole in “ rights management ” is “ management , ” i.e. , ascendence . Is “ restraint ” a synonym for “ enable ” ? Not in my thesaurus . It ’s a law of nature of physics that “ commodious ” and “ DRM - protect ” do not exist in the same place .

Similarly , consumer who want to ingest content on only a single equipment can pay less than those who require to use it across all of their entertainment areas – vacation home , railroad car , dissimilar devices and remotely . Abandoning DRM now will unnecessarily doom all consumers to a “ one size go all ” berth that will increase costs for many of them .

I recall what you have in mind is not “ pay less ” for a “ individual machine ” but “ pay more ” to utilize content I own wherever and on whatever I please . God veto I really own the content that I yield for lock , gunstock , and barrel without DRM dictating how I use it . You acknowledge , like CDs , which as Steve indicate out ( unless they ’re made by Sony ) , are DRM - free . Polemic as it was , at least the end of Steve ’s missive was kind of on point . We do n’t want DRM . I do n’t call for you to “ manage ” my right . How can you manage right , anyhow ? It ’s oxymoronic , emphasis on the moronic .

Lesdilley

In conclusion , Fred , assorted other dignitaries , no more varsity letter . We have a go at it you ’re full of it . Steve know you ’re full of it . Steve , himself , is full of it . Maybe once you ’ve all really done something about the problems you ’re so glad to prattle on and on about what you have to say might be worth scan .

Yours ,

Giz

Mission Impossible 8 Tom Cruise Hang